The article deals with the initial theoretical position concerning the influence of the verbal form of Criminal Law on its effectiveness. The article also proves the admissibility and practicability of applying the positive foreign experience in order to improve the verbal expression of regulatory direction of Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. According to the analysis of Criminal Code of Ukraine some successful lawmaking decisions in order to make the language of Criminal law more clear and precise is proved. The relevant Ukrainian experience is worth deliberate attention of Russian lawmakers.

It is difficult even for a lawyer to subdivide encroachments on two types, the lack of clearly expressed in language form, understandable to “ordinary people” rules of protection against encroachments of the second kind lead to the fact that in Russia the defender himself often becomes a criminal.

In general, all of the foregoing allows us to conclude that a number of successful legislative decisions are found in the Criminal Code of Ukraine in terms of linguistic expression of criminal and legal regulations, and therefore, Ukrainian experience in this part deserves close attention of the Russian legislator.

Key words: Criminal Law as the language of Criminal Law, Comparative Criminal Law, Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, Criminal Code of Ukraine, lawmaking decisions.

REFERENCES

1. Kuznecova, N. (1973), “Jeffektivnost’ ugolovno-pravovyh norm i jazyk zakona“, Socialisticheskaja zakonnost’, No. 9, p. 29.
2. Kostrova, M.B. (2016), “Jazyk ugolovnogo zakona. Ugolovnoe pravo. Obshhaja chast’. Prestuplenie: akademicheskij kurs “, Vol. IV, Ugolovnyj zakon. Zakonodatel’naja tehnika , Jurlitinform, Moskva, pp. 547–603.

3. Ugolovnyj kodeks Rossijskoj Federacii , (1996), No. 63-FZ,Oficial’nyj internet-portal pravovoj informacii, available at: http://www.pravo.gov.ru (accessed 12

July 2017).

4. Ugolovnyj kodeks Ukrainy (2001), No. 2341-III 2052-VIII. Informacionnaja sistema «KONTINENT», available at: http://continent-online.com/Document/?doc_id=30418109 (accessed 12 July 2017).

5. Nadzornoe opredelenie Sudebnoj kollegii po ugolovnym delam Verhovnogo Suda RF ( 2013), No. 53-D12-33, available at: dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy “Konsul’tantPljus“.

6. Prigovor Zavodskogo rajonnogo suda g. Kemerovo, (2016), po delu No. 1-859/2016, Baza sudebnyh aktov, sudebnyh reshenij i normativnyh dokumentov “Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF “, available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/0WqG2swL4vxw/ (accessed 12 July 2017).7. Postanovlenie Verhovnogo Suda RF ob otkaze v peredache kassacionnoj zhaloby dlja rassmotrenija v sudebnom zasedanii suda kassacionnoj instancii ot (2017), No. 81-UD17-8, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/stor_pdf.php?id=1571250 (accessed 30 July 2017).

8. Postanovlenie prezidiuma Permskogo kraevogo suda, (2016), No. 44u-135, Obzor apelljacionnoj i kassacionnoj praktiki po ugolovnym delam Permskogo kraevogo suda za vtoroe polugodie, available at: dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy “Konsul’tantPljus “.
9. Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verhovnogo suda Respubliki Dagestan, (2016), No. 44U-104/2016, available at: dostup iz sprav.-pravovoj sistemy “Konsul’tantPljus “.
10. Kobzeva, E.V. (2004), Ocenochnye priznaki v ugolovnom zakone , Izd-vo GOU VPO “Saratovskaja gosudarstvennaja akademija prava “, Saratov.
11. Gracheva, Ju.V. (2011), Sudejskoe usmotrenie v realizacii ugolovno-pravovyhnorm: problemy zakonotvorchestva, teorii i praktiki, dis. … d-ra jurid. nauk, Moskva.

12. Prigovor Irkutskogo oblastnogo suda, (2015) , No. 2-12/2015. Baza sudebnyh aktov, sudebnyh reshenij i normativnyh dokumentov “Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF “, available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/7WwlVgFl55j/ (accessed 12

July 2017).

13. Prigovor Kurganskogo oblastnogo suda, (2015) , No. 2-22/2015. Baza sudebnyh aktov, sudebnyh reshenij i normativnyh dokumentov “Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF “, available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/YS2vTv1qbnU8/ (accessed 12 August 2017).14. O sudebnoj praktike po delam o krazhe, grabezhe i razboe, Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF,(2002), No. 29 , Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).

15. O primenenii sudami zakonodatel’stva ob otvetstvennosti za narushenija v oblasti ohrany okruzhajushhej sredy i prirodopol’zovanija: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, (2012), No. 21, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
16. O sudebnoj praktike po delam o moshennichestve, prisvoenii i rastrate: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF , (2007), No. 51, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
17. O sudebnoj praktike po delam o vzjatochnichestve i ob inyh korrupcionnyh prestuplenijah: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, (2013), No. 24, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at:  http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
18. O sudebnoj praktike po delam ob ubijstve (a.105 UK RF), Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, (1999), Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF. available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
19. O nekotoryh voprosah sudebnoj praktiki po ugolovnym delam o prestuplenijah terroristicheskoj napravlennosti: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, (2012), No. 1, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
20. O praktike primenenija sudami zakonodatel’stva ob otvetstvennosti za banditizm: Postanovlenie Plenuma Verhovnogo Suda RF, (1997), No. 1, Oficial’nyj sajt Verhovnogo Suda RF, available at: http://www.vsrf.ru/ (accessed 16 August 2017).
21. Prigovor Chernogorskogo gorodskogo suda Respubliki Hakasija po delu No. 1-24/2015, (2015), Baza sudebnyh aktov, sudebnyh reshenij i normativnyh dokumentov “Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF“, available at: http://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ZpzqGtYIYIVV/ (accessed 12 August 2017).