SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC PERFORMANCE OF APPLICATION OF PUNISHMENTS NOT RELATED TO THE DEPRIVATION OF FREEDOM
Author (s): Bodnar I. V.,Makhlai O. A.
Work place:
Bodnar I. V.
Ph.D. in Law, Head of the Department of Tactical and Special Training, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
Makhlai O. A.
Head of Regime and Combatant Service,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2018 No 1(3):105-116
Language: Ukrainian
https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2018.01.105
It is proved that the content of the convicted person in institutions of execution of punishments of a closed type, causes the crime of human infection. This infection of the person is socially dangerous. The application of non-custodial sentences is more socially useful. The article points to the need for solitary confinement of prisoners to deprivation of liberty at night. Solitary confinement is a requirement of international documents in the sphere of protection of the rights of convicts. Convicted, to imprisonment is limited in communication with the outside world, this brings negative consequences. When executing punishments not related to deprivation of liberty, conditions are not created when the convicted person breaks away from the family, loses social ties.
Convicted persons who serve punishment in correctional colonies are provided with material and personal security in the following areas: placement of convicts; the creation of adequate housing conditions; communal and consumer services; organization of food; organization of trade; organization of clothing. This indicates the economic feasibility of using punishments not related to deprivation of liberty.
Key words: punishment, correctional colony, probation, convicted, deprivation of liberty.
REFERENCES
1.Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy (2003), “Kryminalno-vykonavchyj kodeks Ukrayiny”, Zakon Ukrainy, available at: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1129-15 (accessed 27 October 2017).
- Pugach, V.O. (2004), “Kryminalna subkultura ta poshyrennya yiyi v Ukrayini”, Visti Kryminologichnoyi asociaciyi Ukrayiny. No. 1. pp. 144–147.
- Hohryakov, G.F. (1987), Prestupleniya osujdennyih: ih prichinyi i profilaktika. Erevan.
- Bodnar, I.V. (2012), Kryminologichni zasady zapobigannya vchynennya zlochyniv u kryminalno-vykonavchyx ustanovax zakrytogo typu, dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, 12.00.08, Xarkivskyj nacionalnyj universytet vnutrishnix sprav, Xarkiv.
- Ivankov, O.I. (2016), Mizhnarodno-pravovi standarty u sferi zabezpechennya zaxystu prav zasudzhenyx do pozbavlennya voli, dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, 12.00.08, Xarkivskyj nacionalnyj universytet vnutrishnix sprav, Xarkiv.
- Ivankov, O.I. (2016), Mizhnarodno-pravovi standarty u sferi zabezpechennya zaxystu prav zasudzhenyx do pozbavlennya voli, avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. Nauk, 12.00.08, Xarkivskyj nacionalnyj universytet vnutrishnix sprav, Xarkiv.
- Yakovecz, I.S. (2013), Teoretychni ta prykladni zasady optymizaciyi procesu vykonannya kryminalnyx pokaran, monografiya, Pravo, Xarkiv.
- Kolb, O.G. (2005), Zapobigannya zlochynnosti u miscyax pozbavlennya voli: navch. posib, Luczk.
- Karpets, I.I. (1969), Problema prestupnosti, Yurid. lit., Moskva.