MODERN APPROACHES IN CONVICTS’ CLASSIFICATION TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THEIR SOCIAL DANGER DEGREE

Author (s): Bodnar I., Sheremeta O., Leonenko O.

Рабочее место :

 

Bodnar I.,
Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor,
Head of the Department of Tactical and Special Training,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0003-4016-9276;

Sheremeta O.,
Ph.D. in Pedagogics, Vice-rector,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID 0000-0003-0939-3691;

Leonenko O.,
Senior Lecturer of the Department of Tactical and Special Training,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0002-9748-2469

 

Language: Ukrainian

Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2022. № 1 (11): 42-52

https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2022.01.042

[спойлер title=’Резюме’ стиль=’по умолчанию’ Collar_link=’true’]

The article points out that today’s segregated system of holding convicts for
punishments related to deprivation of liberty in Ukraine, has been handed down to
us since the Soviet regime, so there is a need to rethink the very essence of this
system. It is also noted that today, when determining the criteria for separate
convicts’ detention, a legislator mainly takes into account gender, degree of
recidivism, severity of the committed criminal offense, types of committed criminal
offenses (such distribution is characteristic only for correctional colonies of the
maximum security level and is provided for by Article 140 of the Criminal Executive
Code of Ukraine), convicts’ age, etc. It is considered expedient to supplement the
classification system with such components (criteria) as: the type of criminal activity
and the degree of danger posed by a convicted person. The need for such changes is
outlined in international documents in the field of protection of convicts’ rights.
In particular, the maintained analysis of international documents in the
penitentiary field provided grounds for concluding that in order to ensure safe
conditions in penal institutions, it is necessary to comply with the following
requirements: as soon as possible after convict’s arrival at a penal institution, it is
necessary to obtain information about the convict’s state of health and determine the
appropriate level of security for the convict, the security threat they pose.
While determining the security threat, the following are taken into account: the
risk that the convict may pose to society by escaping (if this risk exists, it is determined
whether he will try to escape on his own, or will involve other convicts, representatives
of the administration, etc., as a part of a group or with external help).
Another aspect of examining convict’s identity is to find out whether they pose a
safety threat to other convicts, the administration of a penal institution or other persons
in the institution, and whether they are capable of self-harm and suicidal behaviour.
Key words: convicts, staff, penal institution, distribution of convicts, security

References

  1. Ukraine (2003), Criminal Executive Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
    2. Bodnar, I. V. and Kondratov, D. Yu. (2021), “Current state of the system of penal institutions in Ukraine”, Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, No. 2, рр. 135–141.
    3. Puzyrov, M. S. (2018), Comparative analysis of the execution of a sentence in the form of imprisonment for a certain period in Ukraine and foreign countries, Dakor, Kyiv.
    4. Council of Europe (2006), European Prison Rules : Recommendation Rec(2006) 2-rev of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the European Prison Rules, available at: https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=09000016809e
    e581 (accessed 20 May 2022).
    5. Tsariuk, S. V. and Samofalov, O. L. (2012), “Monitoring of convicts who have committed crimes after release from prison”, Law and Society, No. 4, рр. 150–154.
    6. Bodnar, I. V. (2012), “Development of the problem of classification of convicts serving sentences in closed penal institutions”, Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia National University. Legal Sciences, No. 1 (II), рр. 200–205.
    7. Bodnar, I. V. (2021), “Ensuring security in penal institutions”, Scientific Herald of Sivershchyna. Series: Law, No. 1, рр. 92–102. https://doi.org/10.32755/sjlaw.2021.01.092
    8. Bodnar, I. V. and Oliinyk, О. І. (2018), “Parole from serving a sentence: specific issues of legislative and law enforcement practice”, Journal of East European Law, No. 48, рр. 77–83.
    9. Kraskovskyi, Ye. M. (2021), “Regarding the improvement of criminal law enforcement in the field of the use of special means”, Current Issues of Theory and Practice in the Field of Law, Education, Social and
    Behavioral Sciences – 2021 : proceedings of international scientific and practical conference (Chernihiv, 22–23 April 2021), Academy of the SPS, Chernihiv, рр. 87–91.
    10. Yakovets, І. S. (2015), “Dynamic security in penal institutions as a basis for crime prevention”, Bulletin of the Criminological Association of Ukraine, No. 3, рр. 180–189.

[/спойлер]

Полный текст.pdf

©2024. Penitentiary academy of Ukraine