DEPRIVATION OF THE RIGHT TO TAKE UP CERTAIN POSTS OR TO BE ENGAGED IN CERTAIN ACTIVITY IN THE CLASSIFICATION OF PUNISHMENT
Author (s):Shyian D. S.
Work place:
Ph.D. in Law, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Сriminal, Civil and International Law, Law Faculty, Institute of Management and Law, Zaporizhzhia National Technical University, Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine;
Language: Ukrainian
Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2018 No 1(3):135-143
https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2018.01.135
The problematic issue of assigning the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities to certain types of punishment, depending on the criteria for their classification, is investigated. This problem has a great theoretical and practical significance, since both the above and other possible classification of the deprivation of the right to occupy certain positions or engage in certain activities will promote the maximum individualization of punishment, the correct establishment of the grounds, the order and limits of its application, the identification of those features of the appointment of this type of punishment , Which should be taken into account by the court when it is applied.
“Deprivation of the right” refers to special punitive forms of punishment that can be applied both as basic and as additional, not connected with imprisonment and with restrictions of property character. It is aimed at limiting the right to work and as the main punishment can be imposed only in cases provided for in sanctions norm, as an additional in cases where it does not provide for sanctions norm of the special part of the Criminal Code. It can be appointed for incompletely-elderly only as an additional punishment.
Key words: deprivation of the right, to take up posts, to be engaged in activity, type of punishment, classification of punishment.
REFERENCES 1. Aleksandrov, Yu.V., Antypov, V.I. and Dudorov, O.O. (2008), Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy, Atika, Kyiv.
- Baulin, Yu.V., Borysov, V.I. and Havrysh S. B. (2003), Kryminalnyi kodeks Ukrainy: naukovo-praktychnyi komentar, In Yure, Kyiv.
- Tiutiuhin, V.I. (1974), “Poriadok pryznachennia pokarannia u vyhliadi pozbavlennia prava zaimaty pevni posady abo zaimatysia pevnoiu diialnistiu“, Problemy pravoznavstva, Kyiv, No. 29, pp. 111–118.
- Bohatyrov, I.H. (2006), Kryminalni pokarannia, ne poviazani z pozbavlenniam voli (teoriia i praktyka yikh vykonannia kryminalno-vykonavchoiu inspektsiieiu), avtoref. dys. … d-ra yuryd. nauk, Kyiv.
- Bohatyrov, I.H. (2007), Kryminalno-vykonavche pravo Ukrainy, Dniprop. derzh. un-t vnutr. Sprav, Dnipropetrovsk.
- Andrushka, V.H., Honcharenka, Ye.V. and Fesenka, P.P. (2008), Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Dakor, Kyiv.
- Ponomarenko, Ju.A. (2009), Vidy nakazanij po ugolovnomu pravu Ukrainy, FINN, Har’kov.
- Kozyrieva, V.P. (2007), Kryminalni pokarannia mainovoho kharakteru za zakonodavstvom Ukrainy, avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kyiv.
- Sarkisova, Je.A. (1990), Rol’ nakazanija v preduprezhdenii prestuplenij, Navuka і tjehnіka, Minsk.
- Bazhanov, M.I. (1980), Naznachenie nakazanija po sovetskomu ugolovnomu pravu, Vishha shkola. Golovnoe izd-vo, Kiev.
- Krylova, E.S. (2002), Lishenie prava zanimat’ opredeljonnye dolzhnosti ili zanimat’sja opredeljonnoj dejatel’nost’ju kak vid ugolovnogo nakazanija po zakonodatel’stvu Rossii i zarubezhnyh stran, dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk, Kazan’.
- Stanovskij, M.N. (1999), Naznachenie nakazanija, Juridicheskij centr Press Sankt-Peterburg.
- Rossijskoe ugolovnoe pravo, (2001), Vol. 1, Obshhaja chast’, Profobrazovanie Moskva.
- Potebenka, M.O. and Honcharenka, V.H. (2001), Naukovo-praktychnyi komentar do Kryminalnoho kodeksu Ukrainy, Vol. 1, Zahalna chastyna, Forum, Kyiv.
- Bazhanov, M. I., Baulin, Yu.V. and Borysov, V.I. (2005), Kryminalne pravo Ukrainy, Yurinkom Inter, Kyiv.
- Antypov, V.V. (2005),Obstavyny, shcho vykliuchaiut mozhlyvist zastosuvannia pevnykh vydiv pokaran, avtoref. dys. … kand. yuryd. nauk , Kyiv.