LAND OFFENSES: DISTINCTION BETWEEN CRIMINAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND DISCIPLINARY LIABILITY

Author (s): Petkov V., Komar A.

Work place:

Petkov V.,

Doctor of Law, Professor, Honored Lawyer of Ukraine,

Chief Researcher at the Research Laboratory

for the Prevention of Criminal Offenses,

Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

ORCID: 0000-0003-4310-5876;

Komar A.,

Postgraduate student,

Military Institute

Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine

ORCID: 0009-0006-2030-2411

 

Language: Ukrainian

Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2024. № 1 (15): 158–174

https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2024.01.158

Summary

The constitutional principles of a democratic and legal state guide the development of Ukraine in the direction of people’s rule and a legal state. Therefore, the subsystem of legal norms regulating homogeneous relations in the sphere of public and state maintenance of law and order acquires special importance for the materialization of formal and declarative norms about a democratic and legal state. Therefore, it is relevant to substantiate the need to separate the rules (norms) of public (public) order and disciplinary responsibility for their violation from the branches of administrative legislation into a separate branch according to the postulates of law. It is appropriate that the state regulation of behavior in public (public) places should be set out in the Code of Public Order. And the norms regulating responsibility for land, forest, air, etc. misdemeanors were transferred to the basic codes regulating legal relations in the relevant spheres of socio-economic life. At the same time, the primary task is to update and reform legislation based on the postulates and axioms of legal theories.

The formation and development of civil society, organized into a democratic, social, legal state, in accordance with the principle of popular sovereignty, leads to changes in the very essence of delictological legal relations, a return to the postulates of legal theory (in the context of revived natural law). The separation of prescriptions and sanctioned customs of public order into an independent branch of law by including public rules regulating this order in its institutions forms a system of norms of public legal order. The proposed differentiation and systematization of legal responsibility is the basis for bringing the legal system into compliance with the axioms of the theory of law (jurisprudence) based on the postulates of Roman civil law. This will contribute to the improvement of both public order, in particular, and the development of civil society institutions, democracy, and the establishment of the rule of law in general. As well as the humanization of legal responsibility, the spread of educational and psychological measures of social (moral) responsibility, the strengthening of the discipline of social coexistence, the education of citizens’ self-discipline as a component of individual legal awareness. The transfer of norms regarding the responsibility for land offenses of private law officials and citizens to the basic land code will allow to systematize and separate the norms regarding the direct administrative responsibility of public law officials (state authorities, local self-government bodies) for illegal actions (inaction), land offenses in the field of management.

Key words: legal responsibility, criminal offense, administrative offense, land offenses, land offenses in the field of management, public order, public misdemeanor.

 

References

  1. Kolodiy, A. M. (1998), Principles of Law of Ukraine, Jurinkom Inter, Kyiv.
  2. Skakun, O. F. (2010), Theory of State and Law, Alerta, Kyiv.
  3. Ukraine (2003), Civil Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  4. Ukraine (2001), Criminal Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  5. Petkov, S. (2020), Division of an offense (delictum) by the degree of public danger into a misdemeanor (socially harmful act) and a crime (socially dangerous act) in the context of criminal justice reform, Public Law, № 1 (37). https://doi.org/10.37374/2020-37-07
  6. Korzhansky, M. (2001), Criminal Law and Legislation of Ukraine. General part. Course of lectures, Atika, Kyiv.
  7. Galunko, V., Dikhtievskyi, P., Kuzmenko, O., Stetsenko, S. (2018), Administrative law of Ukraine. Full course, Oldi-Plus, Kherson.
  8. Petkov, S., Kopotun, I. (2020), Delictology, European Institute of Postgraduate Education, Prague.
  9. Petkov, S. (2020), Scientific and Practical Commentary on the Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses, Jurinkom Inter, Kyiv.
  10. Kuzmenko, O. V., Pastukh, I. D., Pluhatyr, M. V. (2017), Administrative Law. General part. Multimedia textbook, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv.
  11. Butyak, Y. P., Garashchuk, V. M., Bogutskyi, V. V. and others (2013), Administrative Law of Ukraine, Pravo, Kharkiv.
  12. Ukraine (2005), The Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  13. Ukraine (2016), On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  14. Kruglov, O. M. (2011), “Legal correlation of the terms “official” and “official” in Ukraine”, Scientific Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk State University of Internal Affairs, №4.
  15. Ukraine (1971), Code of Laws on Labor of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  16. Petkov, S. V. (2014), Theory of Administrative Law, KNT, Kyiv.
  17. Ukraine (2002), Land Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  18. Ukraine (2010), Tax Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  19. Ukraine (2012), Customs Code of Ukraine : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  20. Ukraine (1984), Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses : Law of Ukraine, Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, Kyiv.
  21. Pogribnyi, O. O., Karakash, I. I. (2003), Land Law of Ukraine, Istyna, Kyiv.

[collapse]

Read more >

©2024. Penitentiary academy of Ukraine