PECULIARITIES OF INTERACTION AMONG PENAL INSTITUTIONS, AUTHORIZED PROBATION BODIES AND SUBJECTS OF SOCIAL PATRONAGE WHILE PREPARING PERSONS SERVING A SENTENCE OF RESTRAINT OF LIBERTY OR IMPRISONMENT FOR A CERTAIN PERIOD FOR RELEASE
Author (s): Olefir L.I., Furkalo S. S.
Work place:
Olefir L. I.,
Ph.D. in Law, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Criminal,
Criminal and Executive Law and Criminology,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
ORCID: 0000-0003-4565-8968;
Furkalo S. S.,
Officer of the 361-st academic group,
Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine
Language: Ukrainian
Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2020. № 2 (8): 40-52
https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2020.02.040
This article is devoted to the peculiarities of interaction among penal institutions, authorized probation bodies and subjects of social patronage while preparing persons serving a sentence of restraint of liberty or imprisonment for a certain period for release. Penitentiary institutions are not institutions intended for recreation. Convicts in places of deprivation of liberty pass and must pass certain difficulties. That is why these institutions are points of increased social and psychological tension, which in one way or another determine the whole meaning of convict’s life. But all these difficulties and legal restrictions should be, firstly, based on the law, and secondly, optimal, that is, conditioned only by considerations of achieving the goal of correcting a convicted person and preventing the commission of new crimes. A state that claims the high rank of law has no right to revenge. Revenge and unjustified cruelty are not only immoral, but also ineffective in criminological terms, because evil breeds evil, violence breeds violence. Thus, the process of release from penitentiary institutions should maximize a released person’s socialization in the shortest possible time, taking into account the pooling of efforts of all interested structures: penitentiary institutions, authorized probation bodies and subjects of social patronage. This will allow a released person to integrate into society quickly, restore the lost social ties, which will subsequently ensure the safety of the society itself and make it impossible for a released to commit new crimes. In this regard, the Standard Minimum Rules for the Treatment of Prisoners states that it is worth thinking about prisoner’s future after release from the very beginning of their sentence. Until then, they should be encouraged and helped to maintain and strengthen ties with individuals or institutions outside the prison who can promote inclusion in society and protect the best interests of their family.
Key words: interaction, penitentiary institutions, probation period, social patronage, release, restriction on freedom, imprisonment.
References
- Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, (2004), Manual on human rights training for prison staff, Publishing House of UN, New York, Geneva.
- Howard, John (1777), The State of the Prisons in England and Wales: With Preliminary Observations, and an Account of Some Foreign Prisons, London.
- Beccaria, Ch. (2004), “On crimes and punishments”, INFRA-M, Moscow.
- Poznyshev, S. V. (1923), Textbook of criminal law: An outline of the basic principles of the general and special part of the science of Criminal Law, Vol. 1: General part, Moscow.
- Natashev, A. E. and Struchkov, N. A. (1967), Fundamentals of the Theory of Corrective Labor Law, Yurid.lit., Moscow.
- Dzhuzha, O. M. (2015), Crime prevention: criminological and victimological paradigm, National Academy of Internal Affairs, Kyiv.
- Holina, V. V. (2006), “Crime prevention: problems of social activity optimization”, Bulletin of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, No. 3 (46), рр. 206–214.
- Council of Europe (2006), European Penitentiary Rules, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the States Parties, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_032(accessed 20 September 2020).
- Council of Europe (2017), Оn the European Rules on community sanctions and measures, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers of the States Parties, available at: https://www.probation.gov.ua/wp-content /uploads/2019/04/Rec20173-CSM-and-commentary_%D1%83%D0%BA% D1%80%D0%B0%D1%97%D0%BD%D1%81%D1%8C%D0%BA%D0%BE%D1%8E-%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D1%8E-%D0% BE%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%BD%D0%B8%D0%B9-%D0%B2%D0%B0%D1%80%D1%96%D0%B0%D0 %BD%D1%82.pdf (accessed 22 September 2020).
- Baranov, Yu. V. (2008), Resocialization of convicts sentenced to imprisonment and those ones released from this punishment: theoretical-methodological and legal foundations, Moscow.
- Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine; Ministry of Health Protection of Ukraine, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine (2018), About the consolidated order of interaction, the establishment of a punishment, the trusting of organs for nutrition, testing and sub-social patronage from the hour of preparation until the end of the day, Order of the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine, Ministry of Social Policy of Ukraine; Ministry of Health Protection of Ukraine, Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show /z0408-18#Text (accessed 18 September 2020).