COMPARATIVE ANALYSES OF EASTERN EUROPEAN AND NATIONAL PENITENTIARY SYSTEM OF CRIMINAL PENALTIES EXECUTION

Author (s): Ivankov O. I., Yermak O. V.

Work place:

Ivankov O. I.,

Ph.D. in Law,

Associate Professor of the Department of Criminal, Criminal and Executive Law and Criminology, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine

Yermak O. V.

Ph.D. in Law,

Associate Professor of the Department of  Criminal, Criminal and Executive Law and Criminology, Academy of the State Penitentiary Service, Chernihiv, Ukraine;

Language: Ukrainian

Criminal Executive System: Yesterday. Today. Tomorrow. 2018. № 2 (4): 70-80

https://doi.org/10.32755/sjcriminal.2018.02.070

Summary:

The article is devoted to the description of the Eastern European type of penitentiary system to which Ukraine and a number of other countries belong, in particular: Albania, Bulgaria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Greece, Kosovo, Macedonia, Poland, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Croatia, Montenegro, Czech Republic that is characterized by the following features: a fairly high number of people in detention; the minimum number of convicts who are foreign citizens; a slight excess of regulatory capacity of correctional institutions, a shortage of skilled workers, their constant rotation and not always the appropriate level of professional training are the main observations and recommendations of the supervisory bodies of the Council of Europe and other human rights organizations regarding the functioning of penitentiary institutions. The Eastern European type of penitentiary system is characterized by a search for a balanced approach to resolving the dilemmas between public safety and respect for the human rights doctrine, as well as the conditions of imprisonment in the form of imprisonment (which in most postSoviet states are destined to life), that often do not meet European penitentiary standards and regulations. The general trend is to reduce the total length of imprisonment, the gradual increase in prison facilities and the conditions of prisoners’ placement. The practice of using different remedies for convicts’ correction in terms of general education and vocational training, the application of individual programs for serving sentences and social reintegration, training psychological technologies, as well as the particular treatment of certain categories of convicts (drug addicts, women, persons convicted of sexual offenses, etc.) is expanding. Along with this, it has been determined that the common problems for post-Soviet countries are the overcrowding of correctional ones.

Key words: Eastern Europe, European Committee Against Torture, correctional colony, international standards, preparation for release, Criminal and Executive System, life imprisonment, security level, private prison.

References

  1. On Approval of the Concept of Reform (Development) of the Penitentiary System of Ukraine of September 13, 2017. № 654-р, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/654-2017-%D1%80#n11 (accessed 20.12.2018).
  2. Averyanova J. V., Korobeev A. I. and Chuchaev A.I. (2016), The Seventh Session of the International Forum “Crime and Criminal Law in the Epoch of Globalization”, Vol. 3. PP. 206-217.
  3. On Approval of the Regulation on the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine dated July 2, 2014. № 228, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/228-2014-%D0%BF (accessed 20.12.2018).
  4. General characteristics of the State Penitentiary Service of Ukraine, available at: www.kvs.gov.ua/peniten/control/main/uk/publish/article/628075 (accessed 20.12.2018).
  5. Criminal-executive code of Ukraine. Revision from 04.11.2018, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1129-15/ed20181104 (accessed 23.12.2018).
  6. Corrective Labor Code of Ukraine Revision from 1994, available at: https://dnaop.com/html/47644/doc%D0%9A%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81_3325VII/Кодекс3325-VII (accessed 23.12.2018).
  7. Criminal-executive code of Ukraine Document 1129-IV, first edition – Adoption from 11.07.2003, available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1129-15/ed20030711 (accessed 20.12.2018).
  8. Albanian Prisons Authority, available at: www.dpbsh.gov.al (accessed 18.12.2018).
  9. Criminal Justice Division of Bosnia and Herzegovina, available at: www.fmp.gov.ba (accessed 18.12.2018).
  10. Penitentiary system of Slovakia, available at: http://platformarb.com/penitenciarnaya-slovakiya (accessed 19.12.2018).
  11. Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Slovenia. Prison Administration. Enforcement authorities, available at: www.mp.gov.si/si/o_ministrstvu/ursiks_ organ_v_sestavi/izvrsevanje_kazenskih_sankcij (accessed 19.12.2018).
  12. Ministry of Justice of Croatia. Prison Administration, available at: https://pravosudje.gov.hr/zatvorski-sustav/6150 (accessed 19.12.2018).
  13. Hungarian Prison Service, available at: www.bvop.hu (accessed 19.12.2018).
  14. European Justice. Rights of defendants in criminal proceedings – Slovenia, available at: https://ejustice.europa.eu/content_rights_of_defendants_in_criminal_proceedings_169-si-en.do?member=1 (accessed 19.12.2018).
  15. Ambrož M , Stubbs K. Š. Conditional Release (Parole) in Slovenia : Problems and Possible Solutions. The Prison Journal. 2011. Vol. 91. No. 4. P. 478, 481. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885511424394
  16. Committee against Torture. Consideration of the second periodic report of the Republic of Serbia on the implementation of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, Geneva, April 29–30 2015, available at: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/Treaties/CAT/Shared%20Documents/SRB/INT_C AT_STA_SRB_20332_E.pdf (accessed 20.12.2018).
  17. Radchenko Е. P. (2013), “International experience in the formation and operation of private prison systems”, News of the Irkutsk State Economic Academy, Vol. 2, p. 26.

[collapse]

Full text .pdf

©2024. Penitentiary academy of Ukraine